Prime factorization: factor the number inside the square root into prime numbers, and then simplify (if you get two or more of the same factor, like we got for 3 above).
What is a "principal square root"?
It's .
is always only the non-negative square root.
In other words, 4=2.
Principal square root is a function. A function has only one output for a specific input. E.g. f(x)=x is a map from x to a single output value, the positive square root of x.
On the other hand, I'm not sure if 41/2={2,−2}=±2=±4. Apparently not. Apparently 41/2=4. I need to investigate deeper. Here's some discussion:
The most verbose (and equivalently correct) way to write this would be ±y=±2, but that's redundant (see this and this):
y=2y=−2−y=2Same as y=−2, because you can multiply both sides with −1−y=−2Same as y=2, because you can multiply both sides with −1
Writing y=±2 is equivalent to the 4 equations above, and shorter.
But to make sure you never forget to add ±, I think it's best that you always put the ± in front of the (e.g. when you're converting y2=x into ±y=±x), at least mentally. And then mentally remove it from one side, since putting it on both sides is redundant, as shown above.
set xtics 1
set ytics 1
set xrange [-5:5]
set yrange [-7:7]
f(x) = 2
g(x) = -2
plot f(x), g(x)
All corners of a square are right angles and the same length. Therefore the x,y difference between A and C is the same as the x,y difference between D and B.
The diagonal line from A to B should also be the same length as the diagonal line from C to D. Checking:
You can figure out what the graph of an equation would look like by testing these things:
Y-intercept: set x to 0 and solve
X-intercept: set y to 0 and solve
Whether the graph is symmetric about the x axis: set y to −y and solve
Whether the graph is symmetric about the y axis: set x to −x and solve
Whether the graph is symmetric about the origin: set x to −x and y to −y and solve
1.2.2
21.A={(−4,−1),(−2,1),(0,3),(1,4)}
22.B={(x,3)∣x≥−3}
23.C={(2,y)∣y>−3}
24.D={(−2,y)∣−4≤y<3}
26.F={(x,y)∣x∈R,y≥0}
You can also omit the x∈R. Apparently in that case it's implied that x∈R.
28.H={(x,y)∣−3<x≤2,y∈R}
You can also omit the y∈R. Apparently in that case it's implied that y∈R.
30.J={(x,y)∣−4<x<5,−3<y<2}
41.
y=x2+1
y-intercept=1(0,1)
Remember, y- and x-intercepts are points, so you need to specify them as (x,y) pairs.
0=x2+1x=±−1No x-intercept
y=(−x)2+1=x2+1Graph is symmetric about the y axis
y=x2+1−y=yGraph is not symmetric about the x axis...2=x2+1...but to make sure, we test with point (x,2)...x=±1=±1Point (1,2)−y=x2+1...and then substitute y with -y, i.e. test the point (1,-2)...−(x2)−y=?1−1−2=1Nope, graph is not symmetric about the x axis
−y=?(−x)2+1Test for symmetry about the origin−y=?x2+1−y=yGraph is not symmetric about the origin
set xtics 1
set ytics 1
set xrange [-4:5]
set yrange [-1:5]
f(x) = x*x + 1
plot f(x)
50.
y2=x2−1
y=0±−1No y-intercept
x-intercept=(±1,0)=(±1,0)
y2=(−x)2−1=x2−1Is symmetric about the y axis
(−y)2=?x2−1=y2Test for symmetry about the x axis(−y)2=y2Is symmetric about the x axis
(−y)2=(−x)2−1=?y2Test for symmetry about the origin(−y)2=(−x)2−1=y2=x2−1Is symmetric about the origin
set xtics 1
set ytics 1
set xrange [-5:5]
set yrange [-3:5]
f(x) = sqrt(x*x - 1)
g(x) = -sqrt(x*x - 1)
plot f(x), g(x)
Functions
Term: function
A special kind of relation that maps x to only oney.
In other words, a function is a many-to-one or one-to-one relation.
f(x)=2xIs a functionf(x)=5Is a functionf(x)=x2Is a functiony=±xNot a functionR1={(1,2),(1,5),(2,3)}Not a functionR2={(1,2),(2,−2),(3,3)}Is a function
Vertical line test
If two or more points lie on the same vertical line, then the relation is not a function.
It's basically like casting a shadow onto the x or y axis. You "flatten" the curve onto the x or y axis, thus getting the domain or range.
1.3.1
No
Yes. Domain: {x∣x is irrational}. Range: {1}
Yes. Domain: {x∣x=N12}. Range: N0
Mistake: domain should be {x∣x=2n,n∈N1}
Yes. Domain: Z. Range: {y∣y=x2,x∈Z}
Here it would be a bit clearer to use n in the domain, i.e. {y∣y=n2,n∈Z}, just so that the range can "stand alone" and not refer even accidentally to the domain (where we usually use the variable name x)
No
Yes. Domain: [−2,4). Range: {3}
Yes. Domain: R. Range: {y∣y∈R,y≥0}
The book says that the domain is (−∞,∞) and that the range is [0,∞). Are we both correct? I think so.
Here it would be less verbose to use the range syntax instead of the set builder syntax
Yes. Domain: R. Range: (−∞,4]
Yes. Domain: R. Range: (−∞,4]
Yes. Domain: R. Range: R
No
Yes. Domain: R. Range: {2}
Yes
Yes. I don't see a ± in front of the , so I must assume this is a function. I assume the domain to be {x∣x≥2} and the range to be {y∣y≥0}. Although maybe I shouldn't make those assumptions. Can we allow irrational numbers (i.e. −n) in the range and still have this be a function? I think so.
Yes. y=x3−4
No. y=±x2−1
Yes
Btw, I tried to simplify this into y=x−x91, but that's a mistake: it changes the domain and range. See before versus after. A better simplification is (x−3)(x+3)x (once you realize the difference of two squares in the denominator).
No
No. y=±x−4
Yes
Yes. I don't see a ±.
No. y=±x
P(t). Range: {y∣y≥0} (population can't go below zero).
50 - 53.
What if I set x to 0? We get y3=0, which isn't of much help. What if I set x to 2? I get 8+y3−6y=0, so y3−6y=−8. Doesn't help.
Can I assume there exists a vertical line x=q that intersects with the curve at two points? How can I represent this intersection mathematically? Perhaps with a system of equations?
(The book doesn't offer solutions for 48.-53.)
Can sqrt[n]{-x} ever result in a non-imaginary number?
Yes: taking an odd root of a negative will result in a negative number.
Example: 3−27=−3
It's basically only even roots of negative numbers that you need to be careful of.